Legal Opinion

Fruth, Inc. v. OptumRX, Inc., et al.

District Court, S.D. West Virginia

Decided September 28, 2026No. 2:25-cv-00751Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION FRUTH, INC., Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:25-cv-00751 OPTUMRX, INC., et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Pending before the Court are multiple outstanding motions filed by Plaintiff Fruth, Inc. (“Plaintiff”); Defendant OptumRX, Inc. (“Optum”); Defendant Caremark, L.L.C. and Defendant CaremarkPCS Health, L.C.C. (collectively, “Caremark”); and Defendant Express Scripts, Inc. (“Express Scripts”). For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS Optum and Caremark’s motions to…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API