Legal Opinion

Hannah Finkel v. Docutel/olivetti Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 27, 1987No. 86-1680PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FELDMAN, District Judge:

This appeal asks whether the fraud on the market theory applies in 10b-5 securities fraud suits when the securities at issue were purchased in the open market. In the limited context of this opinion, we hold that the answer is yes and, therefore, proof of reliance on specific misconduct in the purchase or sale of a security in the open market is not a requisite key to recovery. Thus, we affirm in part and reverse in part, and remand to the district court for proceedings consistent with the parameters set here.

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiff, Hannah Finkel, brought this action…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Blackie v. BarrackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  4. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,853 John Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  5. Huddleston v. Herman & MacLeanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. TamboneCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
  2. Cammer v. BloomDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
  3. Abell v. Potomac Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  4. Binder v. GillespieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. International Union of Operating Engineers Local No. 68 Welfare Fund v. Merck & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2007

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API