Legal Opinion

Schibel v. Eymann

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 3, 2017No. 93214-0Published

1Opinion of the Court

Tl^is opinioh was filed for fecord IN CLinct omei X oeumtseeniOFwwwGTOH DATE AUG Q 3 2917 i ^OA/ikAAAA-i- (S SUSAN L. CARLSON SUPREME COURT CLERK CmEFJUSTKE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON JAMES SCHIBEL, an individual, and PATTI SCHIBEL,an individual; and the No. 93214-0 marital community thereof. Respondents, V. RICHARD EYMANN,an individual; EYMANN ALLISON HUNTER JONES,PS, En Banc a Washington professional services corporation; MICHAEL WITHEY,an individual; LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL WITHEY,PLLC, a Washington professional limited liability company. Petitioners. Filed AUu 0 3 2017…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Bradley v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  5. Helvering v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API