Legal Opinion

Hoven v. Amrine

Montana Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1986No. 86-330PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sheehy

William Amrine and Larry Vervick appeal from a judgment of the District Court, Fourth Judicial District, Missoula County, awarding attorney fees to Vernon Hoven. We affirm the District Court’s award.

Hoven, Amrine and Vervick equal shareholders in the Missoula accounting firm of Hoven, Vervick & Amrine. In July 1979, Amrine and Vervick entered into an agreement to purchase stock from Hoven. The agreement provided for the award of attorney fees in the event a lawsuit was brought to enforce any of the provisions of the agreement.

In June, 1985, Hoven served default notices on Amrine and Vervick…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Medhus v. DutterMontana Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Jordan v. Elizabethan ManorMontana Supreme Court · 1979

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Stanley v. LemireMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Boyne USA, Inc. v. Lone Moose Meadows, LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Thompson v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  4. R.C. Hobbs Enterprises, LLC v. J.G.L. Distributing, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Farm Credit Bank of Spokane v. HillMontana Supreme Court · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API