Legal Opinion
United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Robert Wulff and Caitlyn Wulff, Husband and Wife v. Cma, Inc. And Reliance Insurance Company
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 27, 1989No. 88-4207PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judge:
Robert and Caitlyn Wulff (the “Wulffs”) appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Reliance Insurance Company (“Reliance”) dismissing the Wulffs’ Miller Act suit filed under 40 U.S.C. § 270a. We affirm.
FACTS
CMA, Inc. (“CMA”) as the prime contractor on a federal construction project for a Veterans Administration hospital in Boise, Idaho, supplied a payment bond written by Reliance Insurance Company in favor of the United States as required by the Miller Act, 40 U.S.C. § 270a et seq. (1982). CMA subcontracted with B & K Fabricators (“B &…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- David D. Darring v. Larry Kincheloe, Superintendent of the Washington State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States Ex Rel. Sherman v. Carter Constr. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Edward Ashton v. Kenneth CoryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States Ex Rel. Texas Portland Cement Co. v. McCordSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- United States ex rel. Fidelity Nat. Bank v. RundleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1901
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. v. SchwartzwaldOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- Steven Gregory Dunmore v. United States of America, Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Gardner v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Berman v. LinnaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
- Rollin Paul Goodman, in His Individual Capacity v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.