Legal Opinion
Barber v. Spinal Elements
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided August 5, 2019No. 2:18-cv-06914Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHANE BARBER CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 18-6914 SPINAL ELEMENTS SECTION “R” (3) ORDER AND REASONS Before the Court is defendant Spinal Elements’ unopposed motion for summary judgment.1 Because plaintiff cannot prove essential elements of his claims, the Court grants the motion. I. BACKGROUND This is a product liability case. Plaintiff Shane Barber underwent Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion on his lumbosacral joint on May 19, 2015.2 The procedure involved placing a Zeus #14 Cage, a product manufactured by defendant, in the plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Delta & Pine Land Co. v. Nationwide Agribusiness InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- International Shortstop, Inc., and Sam Talkington v. Rally's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.