Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Taylor

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 24, 1926No. 11,013PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison

This cause involves two writs of error, one on the main case and one on a contempt matter which arose with reference to an accounting had after the original decree had been rendered.

First, as to the main case: Frank E. Taylor obtained a decree against the plaintiff in error which cancelled certain conveyances to her from Frank Taylor, his father, deceased, and she brings error. For simplicity we do not mention personal property because its disposition must follow the decision as to the realty. The ground for reversal is that the evidence does not justify the decree. We think otherwise.

The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ex Parte RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Shailer v. BumsteadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  3. Waterman v. . WhitneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  4. City & County of Denver v. BowenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
  5. Grover v. CloverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hood v. NicholCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  2. Pomeranz v. ClassSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  3. Parker v. GentryArizona Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Buchwald v. BuchwaldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
  5. In Re Clift's EstateUtah Supreme Court · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API