Legal Opinion

Swain v. . Oakey

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 16, 1925PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClaeKSON, J.

The motion for arrest of defendant is based on O. S., 768, subsec. 1, which is as follows:

“The defendant may be arrested as hereinafter prescribed in the'following cases:
“1. In an action for the recovery of damages on a canse of action not arising out of contract, where the defendant is not a resident of the State, or is about to remove therefrom, or where the action is for injury to person or character, or for injuring, or for wrongfully taking, detaining, or converting real or personal property.”

In the present case the order of arrest is founded on an action for injury to character —…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sloan v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1883
  2. Fields v. . BynumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  3. Hayes v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. Gilreath v. . AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1849
  5. Smithwick v. . WardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1859

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Tripp v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  2. Klander v. . WestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  3. Ledford v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  4. Ledford v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  5. Short v. . KaltmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API