Legal Opinion

Klander v. . West

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 13, 1933PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cueiam.

The complaint states alleged causes of action for malicious prosecution and wilful abuse of process. The defendant filed no answer and the clerk gave judgment by default and inquiry. In the Superior Court the only issue submitted to the jury was directed to the 'quantum of damages and was answered in favor of the plaintiff. It was thereupon adjudged that the plaintiff recover $250.00 and costs and that he have execution against the property of the defendant and upon return of nulla bona against the defendant’s person. The defendant excepted only to the clause in the judgment which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carpenter, Baggott & Co. v. HanesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  2. Harris v. . SingletarySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  3. Swain v. . OakeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. Watson v. . HiltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Drill Parts and Service Co. v. Joy Mfg.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  2. Melton v. RickmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  3. Melton v. . RickmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  4. Abernethy v. . BurnsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  5. John J. Woodside Storage Co. v. ReeseCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API