Legal Opinion

Nichols v. Town of Oxford

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 19, 2018No. AC39366PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDiPENTIMA, C.J.

*675 The plaintiffs 1 petitioned the trial court, pursuant to *222 General Statutes § 13a-103, 2 for an *676 order directing one of the defendants, the town of Oxford (town), 3 to repair and maintain unimproved sections of a highway, 4 Old Good Hill Road (road), located in the town. The trial court denied the relief sought. The plaintiffs appealed, claiming that the court erred in finding that (1) sections two, three and four of the road did not comprise part of a highway, and (2) even if those sections of the road had once comprised part of a highway, they since have been abandoned. We conclude that the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  2. Stavola v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
  3. Appeal of PhillipsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
  4. Drabik v. Town of East LymeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  5. American Trading Real Estate Properties, Inc. v. Town of TrumbullSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nichols v. Town of OxfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
  2. Petrocelli v. SheltonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025
  3. Vering v. Groton Long Point Assn., Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API