Legal Opinion
Anderson v. England
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 9, 2005No. 3:03CV116(MRK)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING
KRAVITZ, District Judge.
This case arises out of alleged gender-based harassment instigated by a female employee of the United States Navy, Lieutenant Pamela Coleman, against her male co-workers and subordinates, Plaintiffs Peter A. Anderson, Philip Kujawski, and Christopher R. Wells. Plaintiffs claim that Lieutenant Coleman’s words and actions created a hostile work environment in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., which should be imputed to the Defendant, Gordon R. England, the Secretary of the Navy. 1 Currently pending before the Court…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Love v. Premier Utility Services, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2016
- Redd v. New York State Division of ParoleDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Whitright v. Hartford Public SchoolsDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2008