Legal Opinion

Nash Finch Co. v. Preston

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided November 17, 1994No. 4:94-cv-00678PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

ROSENBAUM, District Judge.

The plaintiff, Nash Finch Company (“Nash Finch”), filed this action on August 4, 1994, asserting claims of professional malpractice, negligence, and misrepresentation against an attorney and his law firm. The defendants, J. Scott Preston (“Preston”) and Rice, Preston, Brown (the “law firm”), move to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, or alternatively, for an order transferring venue to the United States District Court, Eastern District of Kentucky, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). The Court heard oral argument on October 19,1994. The defendants’ motion…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Sher v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. Arthur H. Aftanase v. Economy Baler Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Paisley Park Enters., Inc. v. BoxillDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2019
  2. Fern v. ImmergutMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
  3. Litchfield Financial Corp. v. Buyers Source Real Estate GroupDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
  4. Beverage v. Pullman & Comley, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  5. Fitzgerald v. Zakheim & Lavrar, P.A.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API