Legal Opinion

Seymour v. Goad

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1919No. 9475Published

Error to Rio Grcmde District Court, Hon. Jesse C. Wiley, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailey

The action was by Edward Seymour, plaintiff in error here, to recover $1,500.00 from J. Frank Goad, as Sheriff of Rio Grande County, which Edward alleges is wrongfully withheld from him.

In his answer the defendant sets up that as Sheriff he had taken the money from the person of one William R. Seymour, who is a brother of Edward, when he arrested William upon a criminal charge; that as Sheriff he was retaining 850.00 of the money in dispute under an execution against William, and that by court order duly entered he had been directed to pay the balance-, $750.00, over to William, and had done…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Elwood v. . the Western Union Telegraph Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Colorado & Southern Railway Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Colorado · 1905
  3. Fitzgerald v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1916
  4. Gleason v. Prudential Fire InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
  5. McNamara v. Georgia Cotton Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API