Legal Opinion

Daniels v. Houston, Stanwood & Gamble Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 10, 1914PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Kenton Circuit Court (Criminal, Common Law and Equity Division).

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

"William Rogers Clay, Commissioner

— Affirming.

In this action for damages for personal injuries by plaintiff, Walter E. Daniels, against defendant, Houston, Stanwood & Gamble Company, the trial court, at the conclusion of the evidence, directed a verdict in favor of the defendant. Plaintiff appeals.

Defendant operates a drill press which is used to drill holes in boiler fronts. There are two cog’ wheels on the press, one a disc bevel gear and the other a mesh bevel gear. The press was set on a base about three feet from the ground. The gearing is about a foot and a half…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Shemwell v. Owensboro & N. R. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bosler Hotel Co. v. SpeedCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  2. Hunsaker's Admrx. v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  3. Gibraltar Coal Mining Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API