Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Brown

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 21, 2009No. 91 MAP 2008PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice TODD.

In this appeal by allowance, we address the issue of whether Medicare is entitled to restitution for payments made to a medical provider on an assault victim’s behalf under the Crimes Code. For the reasons that follow, we conclude Medicare is entitled to restitution. Thus, we affirm the order of the Superior Court.

The facts underlying this matter are not in dispute. On January 23, 2006, Appellant Gregory Ricky Brown pled guilty to one count of simple assault for the beating of Scott Rissel, who was treated at Lancaster General Hospital for his injuries. 1 The Court of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FithianSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Fischer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Commonwealth v. BoothSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Commonwealth v. HarnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Commonwealth v. WaltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. Commonwealth v. VeonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Commonwealth v. HartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Commonwealth v. VeonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API