Legal Opinion

People v. Pak

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 5, 2016No. B266718PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

COLLINS, J.—

This appeal presents the question of which value is relevant in determining whether the burglary of a pawn shop achieved through pawning stolen goods is reducible to misdemeanor shoplifting under Proposition 47: the value of the stolen goods pawned, or the value of the property obtained in exchange. The trial court concluded that the value of the stolen goods pawned was the key consideration and denied appellant Jane Jeoungmi Pak’s application to designate her burglary conviction as a misdemeanor on that basis. We disagree with the trial court’s analysis. In a commercial…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. People v. WendeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. People v. RiveraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. In Re Zeth S.California Supreme Court · 2003
  4. People v. JenkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Wasatch Property Management v. DegrateCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. JenningsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API