Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

National Equipment Rental, Ltd. v. A. L. Fowler, D. O. Thomas, and E. O. Thomas, Individually and Doing Business as Fowler Poultry & Egg Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 8, 1961No. 26203_1Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partLumbard, Chief Judge

The principles of comity and judicial economy seem to me to require us to hold that National’s decision first to litigate in the Alabama federal court the question of where the dispute should be tried precluded it from raising the question again in the Eastern District of New York after the Alabama federal court had ruled against it.

We are all agreed that a district court may protect its own jurisdiction by enjoining parties from subsequently litigating the same controversy before another district court. E. g., Remington Products Corp. v. American Aerovap, Inc., D.C.S.D.N.Y., 97 F.Supp. 644,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. BlaskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Kerotest Manufacturing Co. v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. La Buy v. Howes Leather Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Baldwin v. Iowa State Traveling Men's Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Ford Motor Co. v. Ryan. Ferguson v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API