Legal Opinion

United States v. Clark

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided March 16, 2005No. CRIM.4:04 CR 159Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

DOUMAR, District Judge.

Appellee-Defendant Justin Clark was convicted of driving while intoxicated in a federal enclave under a Virginia statute assimilated as federal law pursuant to the Assimilated Crimes Act. The offense carries a mandatory minimum prison term of twenty days, which the Magistrate Judge who sentenced Clark did not impose. The Government appealed the sentence to this Court contending that the Magistrate Judge violated the law by not imposing the mandatory minimum sentence. Clark retorts that federal courts have discretion not to impose mandatory…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. Kenneth Wayne Daughtrey, A/K/A Kenneth Wayne DaughtryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
  3. United States v. Antonio A. TeranCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  4. United States v. Andrew Leander PierceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
  5. United States v. John YoungCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API