Legal Opinion
Barkley v. O'NEILL
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided September 13, 1985No. EV 85-164-CPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
BROOKS, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court upon the motion of the defendants to dismiss this action pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court having considered the motion and supporting memoranda, the opposition of the plaintiff thereto as well as the oral arguments of counsel, and now being duly advised in the premises finds, for the reasons set forth below, that the motion should be granted.
Plaintiff, Mark Barkley, on May 22,1985, brought this action individually and as a representative of a class of voters similarly…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Barry v. United States Ex Rel. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Richard D. McIntyre v. Michael Fallahay and Frank McCloskey Frank McCloskey v. Richard D. McIntyreCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Johnson v. StevensonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rose v. Council for Better Education, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1989
- Lamb v. HammondCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- Spence v. ClintonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996
- Rose v. Council for Better Education, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1989