State Ex Rel. Voelkel v. Thiessen
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J.
So many of the facts as are necessary to an understanding of this controversy may be summarized as follows : The city of Oshkosh acquired its water plant in 1913 and has operated it ever since. From 1913 to the end of 1927 certain water mains were installed and extended at a cost of $252,973.36, all of which was charged to and paid by the water department, notwithstanding the provisions of sec. 925 — 100, Stats. 1913, which, so far as here material, was as follows:
“1. The board of public works, before laying any water pipe . . . along any street . . . shall assess against the several lots . .…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State ex rel. Mc Curdy v. TappanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
- Lund v. Chippewa CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
- State v. HeinemannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
3Cited by6 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Holmes v. KruegerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Federal Paving Corp. v. PrudischWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
- State Ex Rel. City of Madison v. BareisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1946
- (2001), Maryland Attorney General Reports2001
- Federal Paving Corp. v. PrudischWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.