Legal Opinion
Thompson v. Clarkson Power Flow, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided February 21, 1979No. 56209, 56210PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Webb, Presiding Judge.
1. On the first appearance of this case (Thompson v. Clarkson Power Flow, Inc., 147 Ga. App. 770 (1978)), we held that the appeals should be dismissed because even though the trial court had made a determination of finality pursuant to CPA § 54(b) (Code Ann. § 81A-154 (b)), the dismissals of the third-party complaints, which left the main action still pending, did not meet the separate, self-contained definition of "final” prescribed by the Appellate Practice Act — "where the cause is no longer pending in the court below.” Code Ann. § 6-701(a) (1).
On certiorari the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Coe & Payne Co. v. Wood-Mosaic Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1973
- Culwell v. Lomas & Nettleton CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
- Walker v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
- O'Neal Steel, Inc. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Southwest Grease & Oil (Omaha), Inc. v. Clarkson Power Flow, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Clarkson Power Flow, Inc. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
- Thurman v. Unicure, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Butler v. Biven Software, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Butler v. Biven Software, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1996