Legal Opinion

State v. Kiesau

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 13, 1990No. 16561PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLANIGAN, Chief Judge.

This appeal must be dismissed because appellant has not furnished a transcript of the evidence and the issues are moot.

The state seeks to appeal from an order of the Circuit Court of Ozark County suppressing evidence in four felony proceedings. Defendants below and respondents here are Robert Kiesau and Carol Kiesau. One proceeding against defendant Carol Kiesau was based on a complaint charging her with the felony of manufacturing marijuana. In the other proceeding she was charged with possessing more than 35 grams of marijuana. In the other two cases, similar…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. YowellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
  2. United States Ex Rel. Rutz v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
  4. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
  5. Preisler v. DohertySupreme Court of Missouri · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. BrockMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. State v. SchusterMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Professional Houndsmen of Missouri, Inc. v. County of BooneMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. STATE OF MISSOURI v. TATUM CLARK MCMILLIAN, Defendant-Respondent.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API