Legal Opinion

Gary Easley v. County of Santa Clara

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 28, 2017No. 13-16277UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ***

Plaintiff/Appellant Gary Easley appeals from the entry of summary judgment on all claims alleged in his Complaint. We have jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

1. Summary judgment was properly entered on Easley’s claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C, § 1983 against the Sheriffs Deputy, Gerard Wallace, alleging illegal detention and false arrest, illegal search and seizure, Monell liability, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and unlawful vehicle seizure and impound. Deputy Wallace had reasonable suspicion to briefly detain Easley for investigative purposes when he…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Philomene Long, Surviving Spouse and Heir-At-Law of John Thomas Idlet, Deceased v. County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Loggervale v. County of AlamedaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
  2. Turner v. Modesto Police DepartmentDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API