Waialua Agr. Co. v. United Sugar Workers
District Court, D. Hawaii
1Opinion of the Court
McLaughlin, chief judge.
The defendants have moved to dismiss -.this action for damages for breach of a -collective bargaining contract in an industry affecting interstate and foreign com-merce. Their grounds are, first, that section 185(a) of 29 U.S.C.A., under which -the action is brought, is unconstitutional in •its delegation of jurisdiction to the courts -of the United States, since Congress has removed the factor of diversity of citizen-ship. Next, the defendants contend that '.because the complaint indicates that some «of the employees represented by the defendants are in an…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- United States v. Standard Oil Co. Of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. Wrightwood Dairy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Farmers Reservoir & Irrigation Co. v. McCombSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Association of Westinghouse Salaried Employees v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Antonio Copra v. Jose A. SuroCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1956
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Local Union No. 25, A.F.L. v. W. L. Mead, Inc., (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1956
- Donnelly v. United Fruit Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
- United Farm Workers Organizing Committee v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.