Legal Opinion
Missouri Portland Cement Co. v. Walker Barge Fleeting Service, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided March 31, 1982No. Civ. A. 78-0106-PPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
JOHNSTONE, District Judge.
In this admiralty suit the Missouri Portland Cement Company seeks damages from Walker Barge Fleeting Service Company and Walker Midstream Fuel Service Company incurred due to the sinking of its cement transport barge, the MPC-9. The MPC-9 capsized while in the Walker Barge fleeting area on the Tennessee River near Paducah, Kentucky. Walker Barge and Walker Midstream have each filed a cross-claim against the other. This Court has jurisdiction of this action under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1333. The claims of the parties are…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Reliable Transfer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- The BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Tennessee Valley Sand & Gravel Co. v. M/V DeltaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- O'Brien Bros. v. the Helen B. MoranCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
- Richmond Sand & Gravel Corp. v. Tidewater Const. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Antonio Dimillo v. Sheepscot Pilots, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Valley Line Co. v. M/V City of GreenvilleDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1985
- Clipper Wonsild Tankers Holding A/S v. Biodiesel Ventures, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- AMERICAN RIVER TRANS. v. Paragon Marine ServicesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2002
- American Home Assur. v. L & L Marine Service, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.