Legal Opinion
Richmond Sand & Gravel Corp. v. Tidewater Const. Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided November 8, 1948No. 5771PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOBIE, Circuit Judge.
These libels in admiralty arose out of the capsizing of the scow Janet McGeeney. The parties concerned in the appeals are the Richmond Sand and Gravel Corporation (hereinafter referred to as Richmond), the Tidewater Construction Corporation (hereinafter referred to as Tidewater) and the Connecticut Fire Insurance Company (hereinafter referred to as Connecticut).
On October 14, 1942, Richmond, per the tug Fisher No. 13, delivered its scow Janet McGeeney, loaded with 533.19 tons of gravel or grits, to Tidewater, at a wharf about 1,000 feet north of Tidewater’s job site. At…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Commercial Molasses Corp. v. New York Tank Barge Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Alpine Forwarding Co. v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
- The LafayetteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
- Cummings v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- The Mary T. TracyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1920
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Leather's Best, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. S.S. Mormaclynx, Defendants-Appellants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Terral River Svc v. S C F MrneCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
- In Re WechslerDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2000
- Flowers v. Wayne Smith, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
- United Barge Co. v. Notre Dame Fleeting & Towing Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.