Crawford v. Sundback
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Nancy J. Crawford, Joe Charles Rains, Linda Wilkerson, and Connie Martin ("the plaintiffs") appeal from summary judgments for C.E. Slayton, H.C. Gregg, Ray Sundback, C.J. Kubina, Bobby A. Malone, and David Courington ("the defendants" or "these defendants"), who were substituted as defendants for parties named fictitiously in the complaints. The issue is whether the plaintiffs complied with Alabama's fictitious party practice rules so as to avoid the bar of the statute of limitations on their claims against these defendants. In particular, the defendants argue that the plaintiffs did not…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- COLUMBIA ENGINEERING INTERN., LTD. v. EspeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Davis v. MimsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- Jones v. Resorcon, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
- Wallace v. DoegeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- Walden v. Mineral Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Oliver v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
- Ex Parte Hensel Phelps Constr. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2008
- Lugo de Vega v. SheltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
- Ex Parte Mobile Infirmary Association, 1091490 (Ala. 6-24-2011)Supreme Court of Alabama · 2011
- McGhee v. MartinCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2004
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.