Legal Opinion

Davis v. Mims

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 26, 1987No. 85-1498PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal by permission of this Court, Rule 5, Ala.R.App.P., from an interlocutory order allowing the plaintiff, Tommy Mims, to substitute Jerry P. Davis and Robert M. Hodgson as defendants and allowing the substitution for the fictitious parties to relate back to the date of filing the complaint. We reverse and remand.

Tommy Mims was allegedly injured in a work-related accident on November 24, 1983, while he was employed as a laborer at Standard Furniture Manufacturing Company (hereinafter "Standard"). One year later, on the day the statute of limitations for bringing tort actions…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. COLUMBIA ENGINEERING INTERN., LTD. v. EspeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  2. Threadgill v. Birmingham Bd. of Ed.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  3. Eason v. MiddletonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  4. Minton v. WhisenantSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  5. Dannelley v. GuarinoSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Fulmer v. Clark Equip. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  2. Jones v. Resorcon, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  3. Biondi v. ScrushyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2003
  4. Ex Parte Chemical Lime of Alabama, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  5. Crawford v. SundbackSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API