Legal Opinion

Lentz v. Northwestern National Casualty Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1960PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroadfoot, J.

The trial court instructed the jury as to the emergency doctrine. The plaintiff contends that this was error.

The defendant Wallace testified that it was not yet daylight as he approached the truck, and that it was foggy, resulting in poor visibility. He did not see the truck until he was within 25 or 30 feet from it and.was then unable to avoid the collision. Stahl testified that he left the parking lights on the truck and a witness for the defendant, who passed the truck minutes ahead of Wallace, testified that he saw the taillight. Wallace claimed that he did not see it. In Barker Barrel…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Klas v. FenskeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Barker Barrel Co. v. FisherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Geis v. HirthWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Smith v. PrettyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1868
  3. King v. DavisU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Virginia · 1903
  4. Kuzel v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Kuzel v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API