Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Parcus

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 19, 1993No. 1911124PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

615 So.2d 78 (1993)

Ex parte Jack PARCUS.

(Re Jack PARCUS v. Nadine S. PARCUS).

1911124.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

March 19, 1993.

Rehearing Denied May 7, 1993.

Michael L. Fees and Charles H. Pullen of Watson, Gammons & Fees, P.C., Huntsville, for petitioner.

Earl E. Cloud, Huntsville, for respondent.

2Per curiam

WRIT QUASHED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.

HORNSBY, C.J., and SHORES, ADAMS, HOUSTON, STEAGALL, KENNEDY and INGRAM, JJ., concur.

3DissentMaddox, J.

MADDOX, Justice (dissenting).

This Court having granted certiorari review, I think it should address the following issue: Whether a person has a constitutional right to be advised of…

4Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

5Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pasqua v. CouncilSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
  2. Price v. TurnerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  3. T.E.T. v. Madison County Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API