Legal Opinion

Faulkner v. Gilchrist

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 6, 1932No. 3 Div. 18PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

The suit is under the homicide statute (Code 1923, § 5698) for the death of plaintiff’s intestate (Prank Gilchrist) caused by collision of his car with that of defendant. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

We consider the assignments of error in the order of their presentation in brief. It is not questioned that under our decisions (Cooper v. Auman, 219 Ala. 336, 122 So. 351; Duke v. Gaines, 224 Ala. 519, 140 So. 600; Harris v. Snider, 223 Ala. 94, 134 So. 807; Citizens’ L., H. & P. Co. v. Lee, 182 Ala. 561, 62 So. 199), as well as the authorities generally (Notes 56 A.…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Godfrey v. VinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  2. Duke v. GainesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  3. Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. McWhorterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  4. Cooper v. AgeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  5. Citizen's L. H. & P. Co. v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Maslankowski v. Beam Ex Rel. QuernemeonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  2. Crocker v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  3. Cartwright v. HughesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  4. Parker v. MuseCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1971
  5. Self v. BakerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API