Legal Opinion
Zanganeh v. Hymes
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided February 2, 1994No. Civ. Y93-2953PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOSEPH H. YOUNG, Senior District Judge.
MEMORANDUM
Plaintiffs, Behnam Zanganeh, 9920 Corporation, Laurel Entertainment, Inc., Deborah M. Viola, Kim Marie Lewandowski and Frederick Byron Scheler seek injunctive relief challenging the constitutionality of Maryland General Public Law Article 2B, §§ 86(m) 1 and 71A(d)(2). 2 Violation of these provisions is a misdemeanor criminal offense punishable by “a fine not exceeding $5,000 for each violation.” Md.Gen.Pub.Law Stat.Ann. Article 2B, § 86(m)(2). Defendant, William R. Hymes, State’s Attorney for Howard County, has applied these statutory…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- California v. LaRueSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Salsburg v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Colacurcio v. City of KentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- DLS, Inc. v. City of ChattanoogaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- N.W. Enterprises, Inc. v. City of HoustonDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1998
- Threesome Entertainment v. StrittmatherDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1998
- Dls, Inc. v. City of ChattanoogaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.