Legal Opinion

Alexander v. DeLaCruz

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1976No. 13928PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAUGHAN, Justice:

Plaintiffs initiated this action to recover the balance due under a promissory note and to foreclose a mortgage securing the same. The matter was tried before the court and judgment was rendered in favor of the defendants, dismissing the action. *519The court ruled the signature of defendant Beth DeLaCruz, on both the note and mortgage, was forged; therefore, of no effect. Furthermore, Mrs. DeLaCruz was the record owner of the mortgaged real property, and the purported mortgage did not have the effect of an encumbrance on her property. The court further ruled there was no legal…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Manwill v. OylerUtah Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Bank of America v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. Salt Lake City v. Tax Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Hallowell v. TurnerIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Unruh v. Nevada National BankNevada Supreme Court · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dementas v. Estate of Tallas Ex Rel. First Security BankCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988
  2. Stocking v. SimonovichDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API