Legal Opinion

State v. KADIN

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 7, 2001No. 98-2883-AFE and 98-2883-CFE CA A105529 (Control) and CA A105530PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.

The state appeals from a pretrial order suppressing evidence. It argues that the trial court erred in holding that the warrant did not authorize a search of defendants’ premises. We agree and reverse.

While working as a detective with the Medford Police Department, Officer Gary Hatten received information from a confidential reliable informant regarding defendants’ alleged drug activity. The informant told Hatten that defendants were selling methamphetamine out of their house in Medford, gave Hatten defendants’ names and their physical descriptions, and provided him with defendants’ address.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. WebbOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. BlackburnOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  3. State v. ReidOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  5. State v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. White v. Jubitz Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. State v. BushCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API