Legal Opinion
URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY, ETC. v. Swank
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided November 9, 1981No. 118, 008 CA 19011PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGillette, P. J.
Appellants appeal from a declaratory judgment, equitable in nature, allocating losses incurred in the Marion County Treasurer’s investment of appellants’ and others’ funds of which he had custody. We affirm.
Trial Court Opinion
The facts are long and complex, involving many parties. The trial court’s opinion summarizes them:
"This litigation involves the loss of some $18 million by the Marion County Treasurer of funds in his custody. The loss was caused by improvident or unlawful investment in 'standby commitment’ and 'forward commitment’ agreements. 1 These 'standby’ and 'forward’ agreements…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Davis v. Wasco Intermediate Education DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Sims v. SowleOregon Supreme Court · 1964
3Cited by5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Columbia County School District No. 13 v. Columbia CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- Lane County v. PaulusCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- Dean Warren Plumbing & Liberty Northwest Insurance v. BrennerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- Dean Warren Plumbing & Liberty Northwest Insurance v. BrennerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- Westfall v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982