Legal Opinion

Woods v. Jacob Dold Packing Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 16, 1935No. 31,994PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

In our opinion and judgment filed in this appeal {Woods v. Jacob Dold Packing Co., 141 Kan. 363, 41 P. 2d 748) this court held that since the workmen’s compensation act is complete in itself, its remedies are exclusive, it does not sanction the imposition of interest charges upon specific items of an award, and its legislative history shows the lawmakers’ deliberate intent to exclude allowances of interest from its provisions, it was error for the trial court to allow an interest charge on the item awarded for burial expenses of the deceased workman.

Counsel for appellant now direct our…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Norman v. Consolidated Cement Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  2. Lenon v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  3. Woods v. Jacob Dold Packing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  4. Ketchell v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  5. Jackovich v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1931

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Baker v. St. Louis Smelting & Refining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  2. Greenhaw v. Board of Johnson County Comm'rsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
  3. Wrex v. T.G.&Y.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API