Legal Opinion

Hodes v. Hodes

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1944PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

This is a suit to cancel and set aside a power of attorney and certain conveyances made thereunder, for the reasons: (1) That the power of attorney was procured by fraudulent representations made by the defendant David Hodes to his wife, the plaintiff herein; (2) that the conveyances were not made for the mutual benefit of the plaintiff and her husband, but were for the sole benefit of the latter; (3) that it was mutually understood and agreed between plaintiff and her husband that the power of attorney had terminated prior to the time of the execution of the conveyances in question. From a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brown v. LairdOregon Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Egr v. EgrOregon Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Brown v. HillearyOregon Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fulp v. FulpSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. Dahlhammer & Roelfs v. SchneiderOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Matter of Marriage of EltzrothCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  4. State ex rel. Hodes v. HodesOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Connolly v. State Tax CommissionOregon Tax Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API