Legal Opinion

Hemphill v. Johnson and Johnson

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided January 29, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2012-0279PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.

For more than a decade, Plaintiff Allegra Hemphill has filed suit in federal courts seeking to hold various companies liable for purportedly infringing United States Patent No. 4,557,720 (the “'720 Patent”). This case represents the Plaintiffs fifth complaint alleging infringement of the '720 patent, and the second against Defendants Johnson & Johnson. Presently before the Court is the Defendant’s [7] Motion to Dismiss Complaint Under Rule 12(b)(6). The motion is fully briefed and ripe for adjudication. Upon consideration of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Atherton v. District of Columbia Office of the MayorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
  4. Ward v. D.C. Department of Youth Rehabilitation ServicesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  5. Hemphill v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gharb v. Mitsubishi Electric CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API