Legal Opinion

People v. Epperson

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 9, 2017No. A145868PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NEEDHAM, J.

Penal Code section 213, subdivision (a)(1)(A), 1 establishes an increased sentencing range for first degree robbery when the crime is committed inside an inhabited dwelling by a defendant “voluntarily acting in concert with two or more other persons.” Appellant James David Epperson argues this provision applies only to completed robberies and was improperly used to increase his sentence for four counts of attempted first degree residential robbery. He further contends that even if section 213, subdivision (a)(1)(A), may be used to increase the sentence for attempted robbery,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. WimsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. People v. Tung Thanh LeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. People v. Jonathan T.California Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. People v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. People v. JillieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. CummingsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
  2. People v. CummingsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
  3. People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
  5. People v. MedranoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API