Legal Opinion

Fort Worth & Denver Railway Co. v. Goldschmidt

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided June 23, 1981No. Civ. A. CA 4-80-258-EPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MAHON, District Judge.

There is pending before the Court motions for summary judgment filed by the plaintiffs, defendants, and intervenor. On December 17, 1980, a hearing on these motions was held before the Court. After careful consideration of the motions, briefs, and oral arguments, the Court makes the following ruling.

I. Background

Plaintiffs, twenty-five railroads, and the Association of American Railroads (“AAR”), seek to set aside the revised Freight Car Safety Standards issued by Administrator of the Federal Railroad Administration (“FRA”), pursuant to his authority…

2Cases cited67 opinions

  1. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sweet v. Port Terminal R.R. Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Fort Worth and Denver Railway Company v. Andrew L. Lewis, Jr., Etc., Railway Labor Executives Association, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  3. Fort Worth and Denver Railway Company v. Andrew L. Lewis, Jr., Etc., Railway Labor Executives Association, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  4. Fort Worth and Denver Railway Company v. Andrew L. Lewis, Jr., Etc., Railway Labor Executives Association, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API