Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fort Worth and Denver Railway Company v. Andrew L. Lewis, Jr., Etc., Railway Labor Executives Association, Intervenor-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 6, 1982No. 81-1405Published

1DissentJohnson, Circuit Judge

In resolving the question of whether section 209(a) of the Railway Safety Act allows the Secretary of Transportation to promulgate regulations with a strict liability standard, a historical perspective is helpful. The Railway Safety Act (RSA) of 1970 is the most recent statute in a succession of railroad safety laws which date back to 1893. Its predecessors, which dealt with specific aspects of railroad safety,1 all im*437posed a standard of strict liability on the railroads.2 Faced with a long-standing policy of a strict liability standard in the field of railroad safety legislation, Congress…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Industrial Union Dept., AFL-CIO v. American Petroleum InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. O'Donnell v. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Brady v. Terminal Railroad Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Fort Worth & Denver Railway Co. v. GoldschmidtDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API