Legal Opinion

Goldman v. Goldman

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 21, 1895No. 11,850PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL from the Fifth Judicial District Court for the Parish of Ouachita. Benton, J., ad hoc.

1Opinion of the Court

*1464The opinion of the court was delivered by

Miller, J.

The plaintiff sues on one of the notes given for the price of a stock of goods, claiming the vendor’s privilege. The defence is that there was no ground for the sequestration issued; that the note sued on was compensated to the extent of two thousand dollars, claimed to be .for an alleged violation of plaintiff’s contract not to engage in business. Tender for the residue of the amount is alleged, and there is a reconventional demand for damages claimed to have been sustained by the wrongful seizure under the writ of sequéstration. The…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Zibilich v. RouseoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
  2. Sullivan v. St. Anna's Chapel of the State of LouisianaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
  3. City of Shreveport v. CurcioLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. Beyer Transp. Co. v. Whiteman Contracting Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. Max Barnett Furniture Co. v. MartelLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API