Legal Opinion

Reilich v. Reilich

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 29, 2000PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs and matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in averaging defendant’s income for a three-year period to determine the combined parental income rather than utilizing the most recently filed Federal income tax return (see, Domestic Relations Law § 240 [1-b] [b] [5] [i]; Haas v Haas, 265 AD2d 887). The court further erred in failing to conduct a hearing with respect to the sharply contested issue of the appropriate amount of child…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Haas v. HaasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. DiSanto v. DiSantoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. Krause v. KrauseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Azizo v. AzizoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. Wallach v. WallachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API