Legal Opinion

Rice v. Rice

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 12, 1988No. 63391PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMMS, Justice:

At the time Appellant-plaintiff husband commenced this action, he was a retired police officer receiving monthly pension benefits from the Oklahoma Police Pension and Retirement System. Both parties were, and are, gainfully employed; the appellant as a postal letter carrier and the appellee as a cashier at a supermarket.

The appellee was awarded custody of the couple’s one unemancipated child and child support. Both parties received property and were ordered to pay certain debts. Later, the court amended its journal entry by ordering the appellant to pay the appel-lee’s attorney…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hisquierdo v. HisquierdoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  3. Carpenter v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  4. Seventeen Hundred Peoria, Inc. v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  5. Udall Ex Rel. State Treasurer v. UdallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Jackson v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  2. Tubbs v. State, ex rel. Teachers' Retirement SystemSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  3. McLaughlin v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  4. Christmas v. ChristmasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  5. Marriage of Baggs v. BaggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API