Griffith v. Griffith

MITCHELL, Judge.

Defendant brings forward six assignments of error which are presented in three arguments. Basically, the defendant argues that the judgment of 13 May 1976 should not have been granted.

Defendant first contends that the trial court, in entering the 13 May 1976 judgment, lacked subject matter jurisdiction and that the motion to dismiss should have been granted. The defendant argues that the trial court did not have authority to entertain a motion in the cause to reduce to judgment the support payments alleged to be in arrears, as the only minor child of the marriage had reached…