Legal Opinion

Barnett v. Barnett

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 25, 1968No. 4229PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MYERS, Associate Judge:

In April 1962, appellee, a resident of New Jersey and at that time the wife of appellant, initiated an action under the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act in that state 1 seeking support for herself and their two minor daughters in her custody. The case was referred to the Domestic Relations Branch of the District of Columbia Court of General Sessions for enforcement against appellant, a resident of this jurisdiction. 2 Following a hearing, the trial judge directed appellant to pay, through the Chief Deputy Clerk of the Domestic Relations Branch, $20 a week…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Grand v. GrandDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1960
  2. Jones v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1934
  3. Armstrong v. ArmstrongDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Tuthill v. TuthillDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1964
  5. Webb v. DaigerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1961

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hester v. HesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  2. Sheridan v. SheridanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Davis v. DavisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Willcher v. WillcherDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. Hester v. HesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API