Landwehr v. Fdic as Receiver for Indymac Bank
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Denying the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to Conduct Immediate, Expedited Discovery to Identify the “Doe” Defendants and to Extend the Time for Service on Those Defendants; Dismissing Without Prejudice the Plaintiffs’ Claims Against the “Doe” Defendants
RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the court on the plaintiffs’ motion for leave to conduct immediate, expedited discovery to identify the “Doe” defendants and to extend the time for service of those defendants. For the reasons discussed below, the court denies the plaintiffs’ motion and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Estate of Rosenberg ex rel. Rosenberg v. CrandellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Gillespie v. CivilettiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Columbia Insurance v. Seescandy.ComDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1999
- Chung v. U.S. Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. O'ConnorDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Ibarra v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
- ['GUTTENBERG v. EMERY']District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Attkisson v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Simmons v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Hartley v. WilfertDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.