Miller v. Charlotte Coca-Cola Bottling Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
We have examined the assignments of error appearing on the record and find, none of sufficient merit to warrant a new trial.
The exceptions addressed to the exclusion of evidence do not show what the answers to the questions would have been. The effect of the rulings, therefore, whether hurtful or other, is not apparent. “Where the record shows exceptions to unanswered questions, without more, the exceptions will not be considered on appeal.” Hubbard and Co. v. Brown, 186 N. C., 96, 118 S. E., 896; Allred v. Kirkman, 160 N. C., 392, 76 S. E., 244.
The tenth assignment of error is as follows:…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rawls v. . LuptonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Allred v. . KirkmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Roberts v. . DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- M. P. Hubbard Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- State v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. . AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- In Re Will of WilderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- State v. . RhinehartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936