Allred v. . Kirkman
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal by plaintiff from 0. II. Allen, J., at March Term, 1912, of RANDOLPH. Tbe facts are sufficiently stated in tbe opinion of tbe Court by Mr. Justice Walker.
1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.
Action by tbe husband for criminal conversation and alienation of bis wife’s affections. Tbe jury returned tbis verdict:
1. Did tbe defendant carnally know tbe wife of tbe plaintiff, as alleged in tbe complaint? Answer: No.
2. What damages is plaintiff entitled to recover? No answer.
Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appealed.
1. Defendant proposed to prove by one Mary Nixon “that tbe plaintiff and bis wife did not get along well together,” but tbe question was not answered, as tbe record discloses. An assignment of error must be based upon matter appearing in tbe case or record to which…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. . WhitfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
- Burnett v. Wilmington, Newbern & Norfolk Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
- Worley v. Laurel River Logging Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Morse v. FreemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Hooks v. . HoustonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wright v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Bowman v. . BlankenshipSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Merchants National Bank v. PackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Ward v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Miller v. Charlotte Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.