Legal Opinion

Banks v. Cramer

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1896PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Washtenaw; Kinne, J. Case by Frank Banks against Densmore Cramer for failure to fulfill an agreement to insure plaintiff’s property. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

The plaintiff sued to recover damages from the defendant for failure to fulfill an agreement to insure plaintiff’s property. The testimony offered on behalf of the plaintiff tended to show that the defendant promised the plaintiff to cause a policy of insurance to be written on his dwelling house in the sum of $300; that the insurance premium was paid; and that plaintiff supposed that the insurance policy had been issued, and retained by the defendant as security for a mortgage which defendant or his father-in-law retained on plaintiff’s property. Plaintiff’s dwelling house was consumed by…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dodge v. BloodMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Finkbinder v. ErnstMichigan Supreme Court · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API